|
Hi,
I just found that if a parameter as defined in UrlMappings contains a dot character ("."), the param value received by the controller will get chopped at the position of the dot. e.g. #UrlMappings.groovy The URL can be: http://my.site/tags/web2.0 Then in the controller, the actual param received becomes "web2", instead of "web2.0". Has anyone encountered such a problem too? It looks like a bug with UrlMappings. -- Best Regards, Damien |
|
Forgot to mention this. This only happens when the $tag param is the last one in the URL. So my current workaround is to always append the $max param after it.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Damien Hou <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, -- Best Regards, Damien |
|
In reply to this post by ev0
I had the same problem and found out that this actualy is a feature. In fact this only happens with params at the end of the url because it's considered as a file extension (used for content negotiation).
If you set grails.mime.file.extensions to false in Config.groovy, the file extensions won't get chopped of anymore.
|
|
Ah yes. I can see that now. Thanks for mentioning! I'm using URI extension content negotiation somewhere else in my code actually.
Then I think the feature could be given some tweaks. Like limiting the valid extensions using syntax similar to UrlMappings. That means only recognized format, say, ".xml, .json", will be treated as content negotiation params. Otherwise it's just plain URL. Or, in a DRY way, only enable negotiation for those defined in "grails.mime.types". What do you guys think? On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, houbie <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Best Regards, Damien |
|
Seems reasonable, raise a JIRA
Cheers On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Damien Hou <[hidden email]> wrote: > Ah yes. I can see that now. Thanks for mentioning! I'm using URI extension > content negotiation somewhere else in my code actually. > > Then I think the feature could be given some tweaks. Like limiting the valid > extensions using syntax similar to UrlMappings. That means only recognized > format, say, ".xml, .json", will be treated as content negotiation params. > Otherwise it's just plain URL. Or, in a DRY way, only enable negotiation for > those defined in "grails.mime.types". > > What do you guys think? > > > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, houbie <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > I had the same problem and found out that this actualy is a feature. In > fact > > this only happens with params at the end of the url because it's > considered > > as a file extension (used for content negotiation). > > If you set grails.mime.file.extensions to false in Config.groovy, the file > > extensions won't get chopped of anymore. > > > > > > > > ev0 wrote: > > > > > > I just found that if a parameter as defined in UrlMappings contains a > dot > > > character ("."), the param value received by the controller will get > > > chopped > > > at the position of the dot. > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Bug--UrlMappings-param-containing-dot-%22.%22-in-URL-get-chopped-tp16346107p16346978.html > > Sent from the grails - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Damien -- Graeme Rocher Grails Project Lead G2One, Inc. Chief Technology Officer http://www.g2one.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
In reply to this post by ev0
+1 for the DRY way
|
|
In reply to this post by Graeme Rocher
JIRA created: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILS-2740
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Graeme Rocher <[hidden email]> wrote: Seems reasonable, raise a JIRA -- Best Regards, Damien |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
