GParsExecutorsPoolEnhancer v/s ParallelEnhancer in GPars

[bond_]

What is the difference between:

1. GParsExecutorsPoolEnhancer
2. ParallelEnhancer

Ref: <a href="http://gpars.org/0.12/guide/guide/3.%20Data%20Parallelism.html#3.1 Parallel Collections">http://gpars.org/0.12/guide/guide/3.%20Data%20Parallelism.html#3.1 Parallel Collections

--

Thanks and regards,

Ravi Teja

[basejump (Josh)]

You are asking this on the wrong list. 

but to answer your question

the ParrallelEnhancer used GParsPool which uses JSR-166y and is generally faster.

the ExecutorPoolEnhancer uses GParsExecutoPool which uses the Java Executor classes. Not as efficient and if you are trying to use and existingPool it will not wait for each thread to finish.

the docs should have more info on both of those.

On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Raviteja Lokineni wrote:

What is the difference between:

1. GParsExecutorsPoolEnhancer
2. ParallelEnhancer

Ref: <a href="http://gpars.org/0.12/guide/guide/3.%20Data%20Parallelism.html#3.1 Parallel Collections">http://gpars.org/0.12/guide/guide/3.%20Data%20Parallelism.html#3.1 Parallel Collections

--

Thanks and regards,

Ravi Teja