Quantcast

Validating transient fields

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
19 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Validating transient fields

mail-94
Hi all,

Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am  
currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is  
then saved to disk.

The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a  
string giving the  file's path is.

In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and  
retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.

It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my  
domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If  
this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Dan Shilcock


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

j pimmel
Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.

static transients = ['myTransient']
static constraints = {
if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
}
}

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
then saved to disk.

The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
string giving the  file's path is.

In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.

It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Dan Shilcock


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Marcos Silva Pereira
In reply to this post by mail-94
Take a look at here:
http://grails.org/GORM+-+Creating+a+domain+class

Interesting, there is no information about "transients" in the user guide.

Kind Regards

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
then saved to disk.

The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
string giving the  file's path is.

In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.

It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Dan Shilcock


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





--
Marcos Silva Pereira
http://marcospereira.wordpress.com
"You only live once.", James Brown
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Markus Samuelsson
In reply to this post by j pimmel
Hi,
 
It tried to do what you suggested, but it doesn't compile:
 
My code:
 
class User {
  boolean agree
  static transients = ["agree"]
  static constraints = {
    if(!agree){
      errors.reject('foo')
    }
  }
}
This generates the following error:
 groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: agree for class: User
 
...so I assume the syntax is faulty.
 
 
I have tried with the following constraint:
static constraints = {
 agree(validator:{return (it) })
}
This does what I want (accepts only if agree is True) as long as the field 'agree' is not transient. The problem as far as I understand is that when I declare the field transient, a call to validate() or save() does not check against the constraint at all.
I would be very thankful if someone could tell how this is supposed to be done.
 
Regards,
Markus Samuelsson
 


 
2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.

static transients = ['myTransient']
static constraints = {
if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
 
}
 
}

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
then saved to disk.

The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
string giving the  file's path is.

In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.

It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Dan Shilcock


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email" target="_blank">http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Marcos Silva Pereira
Remember that you are in a static scope (constraints is static). What you must to do is define a custom validator:

static constraints = {
   agree(validator: { value, domain -> /* do what you need here */ })
}

Kind Regards

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Markus Samuelsson <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,
 
It tried to do what you suggested, but it doesn't compile:
 
My code:
 
class User {
  boolean agree
  static transients = ["agree"]
  static constraints = {
    if(!agree){
      errors.reject('foo')
    }
  }
}
This generates the following error:
 groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: agree for class: User
 
...so I assume the syntax is faulty.
 
 
I have tried with the following constraint:
static constraints = {
 agree(validator:{return (it) })
}
This does what I want (accepts only if agree is True) as long as the field 'agree' is not transient. The problem as far as I understand is that when I declare the field transient, a call to validate() or save() does not check against the constraint at all.
I would be very thankful if someone could tell how this is supposed to be done.
 
Regards,
Markus Samuelsson
 


 
2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.

static transients = ['myTransient']
static constraints = {
if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
 
}
 
}

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
then saved to disk.

The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
string giving the  file's path is.

In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.

It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Dan Shilcock


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email







--
Marcos Silva Pereira
http://marcospereira.wordpress.com
"You only live once.", James Brown
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

j pimmel
In reply to this post by Markus Samuelsson
have you tried

 def agree

instead of boolean

the transients we are checking in our working code are loosely declared as defs

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Markus Samuelsson <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,
 
It tried to do what you suggested, but it doesn't compile:
 
My code:
 
class User {
  boolean agree
  static transients = ["agree"]
  static constraints = {
    if(!agree){
      errors.reject('foo')
    }
  }
}
This generates the following error:
 groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: agree for class: User
 
...so I assume the syntax is faulty.
 
 
I have tried with the following constraint:
static constraints = {
 agree(validator:{return (it) })
}
This does what I want (accepts only if agree is True) as long as the field 'agree' is not transient. The problem as far as I understand is that when I declare the field transient, a call to validate() or save() does not check against the constraint at all.
I would be very thankful if someone could tell how this is supposed to be done.
 
Regards,
Markus Samuelsson
 


 
2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.

static transients = ['myTransient']
static constraints = {
if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
 
}
 
}

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
then saved to disk.

The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
string giving the  file's path is.

In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.

It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Dan Shilcock


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

mail-94
Hi All,

The only way around this that I have found so far is to create a  
helper method in the domain class which performs the validation:

void validateImage() {
     if(image.getSize() > MAX_ALLOWED_SIZE) {
         this.errors.rejectValue("image", "some.code", "Image too big!")
         }
     }
}

And then in my controller both the standand and helper validators are called:

def save = {
     def myDomainClass = new MyDomainClass(params)

     //Ensure validation takes place, including custom image validation
     rentalProperty.validate()
     rentalProperty.validateImage()

........

}


Quoting j pimmel <[hidden email]>:

> have you tried
>
>  def agree
>
> instead of boolean
>
> the transients we are checking in our working code are loosely declared as
> defs
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Markus Samuelsson <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It tried to do what you suggested, but it doesn't compile:
>>
>> My code:
>>
>> class User {
>>   boolean agree
>>   static transients = ["agree"]
>>   static constraints = {
>>     if(!agree){
>>       errors.reject('foo')
>>     }
>>   }
>> }
>> This generates the following error:
>>  groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: agree for class:
>> User
>>
>> ...so I assume the syntax is faulty.
>>
>>
>> I have tried with the following constraint:
>> static constraints = {
>>  agree(validator:{return (it) })
>> }
>> This does what I want (accepts only if agree is True) as long as the field
>> 'agree' is not transient. The problem as far as I understand is that
>> when I declare the field transient, a call to validate() or save() does
>> not check against the constraint at all.
>> I would be very thankful if someone could tell how this is supposed to be
>> done.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus Samuelsson
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> > Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain
>> > properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.
>> >
>> > static transients = ['myTransient']
>> > static constraints = {
>> > if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
>> > errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
>> > > currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
>> > > then saved to disk.
>> > >
>> > > The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
>> > > string giving the  file's path is.
>> > >
>> > > In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
>> > > retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.
>> > >
>> > > It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
>> > > domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
>> > > this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?
>> > >
>> > > Your thoughts are appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > >
>> > > Dan Shilcock
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > >
>> > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Markus Samuelsson
In reply to this post by j pimmel
My validator (  agree(validator:{return (it) })   ) is Ok since it works when the field is not set to transient.
 
I tried using def instead of booelan, but still the same problem.
J Pimmel, could you send an example where you are using constraints validation of transient field (where it's working :) )
 
/Markus

 
2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
have you tried

 def agree

instead of boolean

the transients we are checking in our working code are loosely declared as defs


On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Markus Samuelsson <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,
 
It tried to do what you suggested, but it doesn't compile:
 
My code:
 
class User {
  boolean agree
  static transients = ["agree"]
  static constraints = {
    if(!agree){
      errors.reject('foo')
    }
  }
}
This generates the following error:
 groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: agree for class: User
 
...so I assume the syntax is faulty.
 
 
I have tried with the following constraint:
static constraints = {
 agree(validator:{return (it) })
}
This does what I want (accepts only if agree is True) as long as the field 'agree' is not transient. The problem as far as I understand is that when I declare the field transient, a call to validate() or save() does not check against the constraint at all.
I would be very thankful if someone could tell how this is supposed to be done.
 
Regards,
Markus Samuelsson
 


 
2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.

static transients = ['myTransient']
static constraints = {
if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
 
}
 
}

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
then saved to disk.

The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
string giving the  file's path is.

In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.

It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers,

Dan Shilcock


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email" target="_blank">http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email






Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

mail-94
In reply to this post by Marcos Silva Pereira
Hi Marcos,

This issue here is that constraints, either standard or custom do not  
work when applying them to transient fields, they are simply ignored.

Thanks,

Dan.

Quoting Marcos Silva Pereira <[hidden email]>:

> Remember that you are in a static scope (constraints is static). What you
> must to do is define a custom validator:
>
> static constraints = {
>    agree(validator: { value, domain -> /* do what you need here */ })
> }
>
> Kind Regards
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Markus Samuelsson <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It tried to do what you suggested, but it doesn't compile:
>>
>> My code:
>>
>> class User {
>>   boolean agree
>>   static transients = ["agree"]
>>   static constraints = {
>>     if(!agree){
>>       errors.reject('foo')
>>     }
>>   }
>> }
>> This generates the following error:
>>  groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: agree for class:
>> User
>>
>> ...so I assume the syntax is faulty.
>>
>>
>> I have tried with the following constraint:
>> static constraints = {
>>  agree(validator:{return (it) })
>> }
>> This does what I want (accepts only if agree is True) as long as the field
>> 'agree' is not transient. The problem as far as I understand is that
>> when I declare the field transient, a call to validate() or save() does
>> not check against the constraint at all.
>> I would be very thankful if someone could tell how this is supposed to be
>> done.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus Samuelsson
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> > Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain
>> > properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.
>> >
>> > static transients = ['myTransient']
>> > static constraints = {
>> > if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
>> > errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
>> > > currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
>> > > then saved to disk.
>> > >
>> > > The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
>> > > string giving the  file's path is.
>> > >
>> > > In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
>> > > retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.
>> > >
>> > > It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
>> > > domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
>> > > this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?
>> > >
>> > > Your thoughts are appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > >
>> > > Dan Shilcock
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > >
>> > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Marcos Silva Pereira
> http://marcospereira.wordpress.com
> "You only live once.", James Brown
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

mail-94
In reply to this post by j pimmel

Apologies, small naming correction to my example:

def save = {
     def myDomainClass = new MyDomainClass(params)

     //Ensure validation takes place, including custom image validation
     myDomainClass.validate()
     myDomainClass.validateImage()

........

}

Quoting j pimmel <[hidden email]>:

> have you tried
>
>  def agree
>
> instead of boolean
>
> the transients we are checking in our working code are loosely declared as
> defs
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Markus Samuelsson <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It tried to do what you suggested, but it doesn't compile:
>>
>> My code:
>>
>> class User {
>>   boolean agree
>>   static transients = ["agree"]
>>   static constraints = {
>>     if(!agree){
>>       errors.reject('foo')
>>     }
>>   }
>> }
>> This generates the following error:
>>  groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: agree for class:
>> User
>>
>> ...so I assume the syntax is faulty.
>>
>>
>> I have tried with the following constraint:
>> static constraints = {
>>  agree(validator:{return (it) })
>> }
>> This does what I want (accepts only if agree is True) as long as the field
>> 'agree' is not transient. The problem as far as I understand is that
>> when I declare the field transient, a call to validate() or save() does
>> not check against the constraint at all.
>> I would be very thankful if someone could tell how this is supposed to be
>> done.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus Samuelsson
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/2/21, j pimmel <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> > Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain
>> > properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.
>> >
>> > static transients = ['myTransient']
>> > static constraints = {
>> > if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
>> > errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Is anyone aware of a nice way to validate transient fields? I am
>> > > currently using a transient field to upload a multipart file which is
>> > > then saved to disk.
>> > >
>> > > The file itself is not stored in my database via GORM, however a
>> > > string giving the  file's path is.
>> > >
>> > > In my controller I call a service to store the file to disk and
>> > > retrieve the path to the file which is then set on my domain class.
>> > >
>> > > It would be really nice to be able to define a custom validator in my
>> > > domain class to check the type, size etc. of the multipart file. If
>> > > this isn't possible are there any recommended alternatives?
>> > >
>> > > Your thoughts are appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > >
>> > > Dan Shilcock
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > >
>> > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Markus Samuelsson
In reply to this post by mail-94


2008/2/21, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
Hi Marcos,

This issue here is that constraints, either standard or custom do not
work when applying them to transient fields, they are simply ignored.

Thanks,

Dan.
 
Is this behaviour by design, or is it a bug?
/Markus

 
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Marcos Silva Pereira
I have created a new post to discuss it:
http://www.nabble.com/Validation-does-not-work-for-transient-attributes-td15611613.html

To me, this is a bug (so I post a test case in the new post).

Kind Regards

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Markus Samuelsson <[hidden email]> wrote:


2008/2/21, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
Hi Marcos,

This issue here is that constraints, either standard or custom do not
work when applying them to transient fields, they are simply ignored.

Thanks,

Dan.
 
Is this behaviour by design, or is it a bug?
/Markus

 



--
Marcos Silva Pereira
http://marcospereira.wordpress.com
"You only live once.", James Brown
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

mail-94
In reply to this post by Markus Samuelsson

Hi Markus,

It looks like there is already a JIRA report for this issue:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILS-1263

I'm not sure if this is by design or not.

Thanks,

Dan.

Quoting Markus Samuelsson <[hidden email]>:

> 2008/2/21, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> Hi Marcos,
>>
>> This issue here is that constraints, either standard or custom do not
>> work when applying them to transient fields, they are simply ignored.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dan.
>
>
> Is this behaviour by design, or is it a bug?
> /Markus
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Markus Samuelsson
To everyone who wants to validate transient field:
/Markus

 
2008/2/21, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:

Hi Markus,

It looks like there is already a JIRA report for this issue:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILS-1263

I'm not sure if this is by design or not.

Thanks,

Dan.

Quoting Markus Samuelsson <[hidden email]>:

> 2008/2/21, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> Hi Marcos,
>>
>> This issue here is that constraints, either standard or custom do not
>> work when applying them to transient fields, they are simply ignored.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dan.
>
>
> Is this behaviour by design, or is it a bug?
> /Markus
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Randall R Schulz
In reply to this post by j pimmel
On Thursday 21 February 2008 03:45, j pimmel wrote:
> Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain
> properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.
>
> static transients = ['myTransient']

This is new to me. I've been using a "transient" keyword on domain class
fields I want excluded from persistence. Nor can I find this documented
(a thorough grep of all the files in the Guide shows zero occurrences
of "transients"). Can you point me to any documentation?


> static constraints = {
> if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
> errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
> }
> }


Randall Schulz

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Markus Samuelsson
http://grails.org/GORM+-+Creating+a+domain+class

2008/2/21, Randall R Schulz <[hidden email]>:
On Thursday 21 February 2008 03:45, j pimmel wrote:
> Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain
> properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.
>
> static transients = ['myTransient']

This is new to me. I've been using a "transient" keyword on domain class
fields I want excluded from persistence. Nor can I find this documented
(a thorough grep of all the files in the Guide shows zero occurrences
of "transients"). Can you point me to any documentation?


> static constraints = {
> if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
> errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
> }
> }


Randall Schulz

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

mail-94
In reply to this post by Randall R Schulz
Hi Randall,

You can find the information on transients here:

http://grails.org/GORM+-+Creating+a+domain+class

Thanks,

Dan.

Quoting Randall R Schulz <[hidden email]>:

> On Thursday 21 February 2008 03:45, j pimmel wrote:
>> Assuming you want to ensure that the transient can only have certain
>> properties on save, then use the static contraints to achieve it.
>>
>> static transients = ['myTransient']
>
> This is new to me. I've been using a "transient" keyword on domain class
> fields I want excluded from persistence. Nor can I find this documented
> (a thorough grep of all the files in the Guide shows zero occurrences
> of "transients"). Can you point me to any documentation?
>
>
>> static constraints = {
>> if (!myTransient || myTransient >> OUT_OF_BOUNDS) {
>> errors.reject('myTransient is invalid')
>> }
>> }
>
>
> Randall Schulz
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

Randall R Schulz
In reply to this post by Markus Samuelsson
On Thursday 21 February 2008 08:03, Markus Samuelsson wrote:

> 2008/2/21, Randall R Schulz <[hidden email]>:
> > On Thursday 21 February 2008 03:45, j pimmel wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > static transients = ['myTransient']
> >
> > This is new to me. I've been using a "transient" keyword on domain
> > class fields I want excluded from persistence. Nor can I find this
> > documented (a thorough grep of all the files in the Guide shows
> > zero occurrences of "transients"). Can you point me to any
> > documentation?
> >
> > ...
>
> http://grails.org/GORM+-+Creating+a+domain+class

I was asking about the Guide.

I really do not want to have to read a Wiki, with content scattered
across dozens of tiny pages, to get comprehensive information.


Randall Schulz

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Validating transient fields

mail-94
I couldn't find any information in the guide either.

Dan.

Quoting Randall R Schulz <[hidden email]>:

> On Thursday 21 February 2008 08:03, Markus Samuelsson wrote:
>> 2008/2/21, Randall R Schulz <[hidden email]>:
>> > On Thursday 21 February 2008 03:45, j pimmel wrote:
>> > > ...
>> > >
>> > > static transients = ['myTransient']
>> >
>> > This is new to me. I've been using a "transient" keyword on domain
>> > class fields I want excluded from persistence. Nor can I find this
>> > documented (a thorough grep of all the files in the Guide shows
>> > zero occurrences of "transients"). Can you point me to any
>> > documentation?
>> >
>> > ...
>>
>> http://grails.org/GORM+-+Creating+a+domain+class
>
> I was asking about the Guide.
>
> I really do not want to have to read a Wiki, with content scattered
> across dozens of tiny pages, to get comprehensive information.
>
>
> Randall Schulz
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Loading...